Check out our blog for more useful information Email us today Get your free mortgage audit
HomeHow it WorksLender ListOur FeesThe Quick TestThe Mortgage AuditFAQ'sDownloadsBlog

Posts Tagged ‘mortgage mis selling’

High Court Shuts Property Investment

Monday, June 14th, 2010
High court shuts property investment
European Property Management Ltd based in Merseyside has been wound up by the high court.
The firm was found guilty of misleading investors over the benefits of investing, to induce them to purchase shares
The company was formed to secure and manage residential properties in European Capitals of Culture as they were announced.
Cold calling was used to attract potential investors and it is believed that up to 10 other companies may have been used.  None of these businesses were authorised by the Financial Services Authority.  They also made exaggerated and misleading claims about the benefits of investing in this way.
The Insolvency Service’s investigation also led to the winding-up in the High Court, of Corporate Business Angel Ltd, which was based in the Derby area.
The companies’ methods raised a total of £853,395 from private investors in the UK. From the sums raised, the company paid out commissions of £529,945 to the unauthorised entities, which amounted to 65% of funds raised, and as a consequence less than 30% of shareholders’ funds were used for purposes set out in the Company’s Information Memorandum.
Everyone should be wary of get rich quick schemes and the old adage applies: if it seems too good to be true, then it probably is.

European Property Management Ltd based in Merseyside has been wound up by the high court.

The firm was found guilty of misleading investors over the benefits of investing, to induce them to purchase shares.

The company was formed to secure and manage residential properties in European Capitals of Culture as they were announced.

Cold calling was used to attract potential investors and it is believed that up to 10 other companies may have been used.  None of these businesses were authorised by the Financial Services Authority.  They also made exaggerated and misleading claims about the benefits of investing in this way.

The Insolvency Service’s investigation also led to the winding-up in the High Court, of Corporate Business Angel Ltd, which was based in the Derby area.

The companies’ methods raised a total of £853,395 from private investors in the UK. From the sums raised, the company paid out commissions of £529,945 to the unauthorised entities, which amounted to 65% of funds raised, and as a consequence less than 30% of shareholders’ funds were used for purposes set out in the Company’s Information Memorandum.

Everyone should be wary of get rich quick schemes and the old adage applies: if it seems too good to be true, then it probably is.

Kensington Mortgage Company Fined

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

Borrowers Beware! Mortgage companies can still be fined even if they are not guilty of mis-selling.

Kensington Mortgage Company has been fined £1.225m for poor treatment of some customers facing mortgage arrears.

The FSA has identified a number of serious failings by Kensington which occurred between 1 January 2007 and 31 October 2008 in relation to its mortgage arrears handling processes and in its dealings with customers in arrears.

These include:

- A fee for a returned direct debit which was charged regardless of how many times the direct debit had already been returned unpaid;

- An excessive fee for cancelled direct debits which did not reflect administrative costs;

- An early repayment charge on mortgage balances which included arrears fees and charges within that balance.

The firm also failed to take reasonable care to organise and control its affairs responsibly and effectively, and to ensure adequate risk management systems.

Its management information focused on the performance of the firm’s mortgage book and the profitability of the business, rather than on treating customers fairly.

Kensington qualified for a 30% discount under the FSA’s settlement discount scheme.

Without the discount the fine would have been £1.75 million.

The FSA has also taken into account that Kensington has made significant improvements to its arrears and repossession processes since the early part of 2008.

As at October 2008, Kensington had approximately £1.1bn of loans on its balance sheet and securitised assets in the region of £2.1bn.

During the Relevant Period, Kensington administered on average 39,042 regulated mortgage contracts a month with a total balance of approximately £4.6bn.

Mis Sold Mortgages

Monday, February 15th, 2010

Gravitas Law mis selling specialists

Mortgage mis-selling, mis-sold mortgages, mis-selling mortgages, mortgage claims, morgage mis-sold, mortgage mis-representation, miss-sold mortgages It does not matter what you called it or how you spell it, mortgage claims for compensation are increasing.

Consumer awareness is rising with regards to the quality of the advice they received when they took out a mortgage or a remortgage. If the mortgage was arranged by a mortgage broker, they had a duty of care to provide suitable advice.

The broker needed to assess yourneeds and circumstances and based on the information make a suitable product recommendation. The majority of mortgage brokers will put your interests first and recommend a suitable product. Gravitas Law can audit your mortgage and identify any breaches or mistakes caused by any of the professionals involved in the mortgage process.

Regardless of what you called mortgage mis-selling or mortgage mis-represenatation, if there is a possible claim Gravitas Law will identify it and suggest the best route to achieve compensation for your losses.

Good advice is not a matter of spelling or semantics but a necessity in a very complex and regulated market.

Mis sold Mortgages is a trading style of Gravitas Law Ltd.

Gravitas Law is regulated by the Ministry of Justice in respect of claims management activities.

Our registration is recorded on this website: www.claimsregulation.gov.uk
Our Authorisation no. is CRM15800.

Complaints Procedure | Sitemap