Check out our blog for more useful information Email us today Get your free mortgage audit
HomeHow it WorksLender ListOur FeesThe Quick TestThe Mortgage AuditFAQ'sDownloadsBlog

FSA proposals on mortgages

Kensington Mortgage Company Fined

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

Borrowers Beware! Mortgage companies can still be fined even if they are not guilty of mis-selling.

Kensington Mortgage Company has been fined £1.225m for poor treatment of some customers facing mortgage arrears.

The FSA has identified a number of serious failings by Kensington which occurred between 1 January 2007 and 31 October 2008 in relation to its mortgage arrears handling processes and in its dealings with customers in arrears.

These include:

- A fee for a returned direct debit which was charged regardless of how many times the direct debit had already been returned unpaid;

- An excessive fee for cancelled direct debits which did not reflect administrative costs;

- An early repayment charge on mortgage balances which included arrears fees and charges within that balance.

The firm also failed to take reasonable care to organise and control its affairs responsibly and effectively, and to ensure adequate risk management systems.

Its management information focused on the performance of the firm’s mortgage book and the profitability of the business, rather than on treating customers fairly.

Kensington qualified for a 30% discount under the FSA’s settlement discount scheme.

Without the discount the fine would have been £1.75 million.

The FSA has also taken into account that Kensington has made significant improvements to its arrears and repossession processes since the early part of 2008.

As at October 2008, Kensington had approximately £1.1bn of loans on its balance sheet and securitised assets in the region of £2.1bn.

During the Relevant Period, Kensington administered on average 39,042 regulated mortgage contracts a month with a total balance of approximately £4.6bn.

Make a claim for a Mis-sold Mortgage today!

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

Was your mortgage arranged by a mortgage broker? Was your mortgage broker fit and proper? You might have a claim for mortgage misrepresentation.

Your mortgage broker might being directly authorized by the FSA or might been an appointed representative of a network or umbrella company. Regardless of his regulatory status your mortgage broker has to be considered to fit and proper to conduct regulated business like mortgages, investments or insurances.

The repercussions for you if a broker is not following the FSA guidelines is that will exposed to unnecessary risk because he might be recommending unsuitable mortgages.

A reported illegal practice is when the mortgage broker inflates the income figures on the mortgage application and the client is unaware of that. The mortgage broker will manage to obtain mortgage for a client that is unsuitable for the client due to affordability.

If you think that could happen to you and you are struggling to meet your repayment register your details on www.missold-mortgages.co.uk so we can investigate. If the results of our mortgage audit showed that your mortgage failed to comply with the MCOB rules we will assist you to obtain redress for your losses.

Mortgage Claims and Treating Customers Fairly

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Financial Services Authority HQ“Treat your customers fairly”- this is the message communicated from the Financial Services Authority (FSA) who has implemented a Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) initiative.

The FSA have now been working on this initiative for several  years. Their main aim is to ensure that companies are putting their customers first and at the heart of their business. It is hoped that this will boost consumer confidence in the financial services industry.

Businesses must be able to demonstrate that TCF is part of their company culture and be able to provide  solid evidence of this. The FSA has an going challenge to ensure that this initiatives are implemented on a daily basis for clients whom require mortgage, pension, investment advice etc.

Despite TCF communications from the FSA, many companies are unsure about how they will ‘evidence’ the fact that they have been treating their customers fairly. Already, firms are desperately taking steps to alter the way in which they do things to make sure that they are satisfying the FSA objectives by December. Furthermore, there are also concerns remaining in relation to how exactly the FSA will go about enforcing TCF- not to mention the size of fines that businesses can expect.

What does it mean to you?

The mortgage advice given to you should be given relevant to you and your circumstances. Your interest should being paramount for the IFA or mortgage broker and take priority to ensure that you receive the best possible advice.

If you have feel that you interests have not being protected please contact Gravitas Law a consumer specialist that will investigate and achieve redress for you.

Threat to valuers as lenders blame them for losses

Tuesday, February 9th, 2010

Bradford & Bingley, the taxpayer-owned mortgage lender, is threatening surveyors with legal action for over-valuing properties during the housing boom.

The Times has learnt that the bank, whose mortgage book is now run by UKFI, the company that manages the Government’s stakes in banks, is one of a number of buy-to-let and sub-prime lenders behind a mass mail-out of letters to surveyors. GE Money and GMAC-RFC, which were among the biggest lenders of buy-to-let and sub-prime deals before the market crashed in 2007, have also been sending out letters to surveyors after selling homes that they had repossessed for far less than the original valuation.

The solicitors’ letters state that the lender has made a loss on the sale of the property at a lower price than the original value and state that this could be a result of a negligence, informing the firm that it is under investigation.

The practice, which The Times first revealed in October, has already forced Allied Surveyors in England and Wales, one of the UK’s biggest independent surveying firms, out of business as a result of 36 professional negligence claims.

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors, which represents 100,000 surveyors, has accused lenders of putting valuers businesses at risk without any evidence that their valuation was inaccurate. Valuers must inform their PI insurer of the claim and may not be able to afford future premiums if the insurer brands them high-risk.

Property prices fell by an average of 22 per cent before the trough in April last year, although new-build apartments fell in value by up to 50 per cent. A wave of arrears and repossessions — almost 90,000 since mid- 2007, according to the Council of Mortgage Lenders — has left lenders facing potentially significant losses.

Bradford & Bingley and GMAC were among a group of lenders that were involved in securitisation — the buying and selling of loan books between lenders — a practice that was blamed for the sub-prime crisis.

A spokesman for Bradford & Bingley said: “We from time to time discover cases where we feel there is evidence of valuers’ negligence.”

A spokesman for GE Money said that it was “standard practice” when “there is a significant deviation between the valuation and the sale price”. GMAC declined to comment.

Source: The Times Feb 2010

Firms to publish complaints data

Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010

In the continuing battle against rogue firms the Financial Services Authority as said firms will have to publish information on how they handle complaints.

Firms that receive 500 or more complaints in a six-month period will have to release data twice a year showing how many complaints they have opened and closed, the percentage closed within eight weeks, and the percentage of complaints upheld.
All affected firms will have published their first figures by August 31.

The regulator says that this will help it to see how firms are handling complaints and will improve complaints handling standards across the industry.

Firms will need to present this information according to five product areas: banking, home finance, general insurance and pure protection, life and pensions, and investments. 

The FSA will then use this information to publish a consolidated list of complaints data covering all affected firms twice a year.
Its first set of consolidated data in will be published in September.

Sheila Nicoll, director of conduct policy at the FSA, says: “We are committed to greater transparency where this will help consumers.

“For the first time, people will be able to see how many complaints particular firms receive and how they handle them.

“We believe that this will help improve how firms treat their customers and provide incentives for firms to deal more effectively with complaints when they are received.

“Our more intensive approach to supervision places a greater focus on assessing how firms deal with their customers – and how firms handle complaints is a key part of this.”

Bobby Kennedy director of Gravitas Law said, “I welcome the move, and it is long over due.  Consumers interest should always be at the forefront of any advisors mind.”

If you think you have reason to complain and require assistance on how to do so then please contact gravits law on 0800 612 7014

Mis sold Mortgages is a trading style of Gravitas Law Ltd.

Gravitas Law is regulated by the Ministry of Justice in respect of claims management activities.

Our registration is recorded on this website: www.claimsregulation.gov.uk
Our Authorisation no. is CRM15800.

Complaints Procedure | Sitemap